| More
Home / Articles


Posted On April 26, 2007
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Study: Why Food and Drink Bans Won't Solve Childhood Obesity


To see a copy of our report outlining the real cause of childhood obesity (physical inactivity), click here.

Despite the fact that almost all the research on in-school nutrition indicates that food bans are ineffective (and sometimes counterproductive), the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and food activists from groups like the Center for Science in the Public Interest are pushing government regulations on everything from chewing gum to potato chips.

The IOM's narrow standards for foods that should be available in schools effectively squeeze everything but fruit juice, nuts, and a small assortment of produce out of the cafeteria snack bar. And the guidelines outline where and when "permissible" foods can be sold, which athletic teams can have sports drinks like Gatorade or Powerade, and whether fundraisers and bake sales qualify as "nutritionally beneficial." Food provided at booster clubs, PTA meetings, parent-teacher nights, and other adult activities held on school grounds would also be subject to government scrutiny.

Dietary decrees like these may seem surreal, but many schools have already taken things to their absurd conclusion. School birthday celebrations are nearly a thing of the past, with cupcakes banned in classrooms across the country. Some schools forbid parents from bringing fast food to their kids. And in October a British boy was sent to the principal's office because the lunch his parents packed for him did not meet the school's guidelines.

To see a copy of our report outlining the real cause of childhood obesity (physical inactivity), click here.



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • WWJS? What Would Julia Say—A Sweet Video
    Posted On: Wednesday 7/21/2010
  • Big Government Doesn’t Mean Smaller Waistlines
    Posted On: Wednesday 7/14/2010
  • Shaking Up the Nanny State
    Posted On: Friday 5/21/2010
  • Candy = Contraband?
    Posted On: Monday 5/10/2010
  • CCF vs. Vilsack
    Posted On: Thursday 5/6/2010
  • Taxing “Junk Food” Is Trashy Policy
    Posted On: Tuesday 3/16/2010
  • Europe Binges on Fat Taxes
    Posted On: Wednesday 1/13/2010


  • Activist Cash

    Center for Science in the Public Interest
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is the undisputed leader among America’s “food police.” CSPI’s joyless eating club has issued hundreds of high-profile — and highly questionable — reports condemning soft drinks, fat substitutes, irradiated meat, biotech food crops, French fries, and just about anything that tastes good. read more here »

    Kelly Brownell
    Background
    Kelly Brownell is a Yale psychologist on a decade-long crusade against what he calls America’s “toxic food environment.” He is best known for having first proposed the infamous “Twinkie tax.” read more here »

    OpEds

    Small choices and big bodies
    Deciding whether to walk or drive is just as important as the decision to go back for second helpings. read more here »

    Diet isn't the only answer
    A quick inventory of our homes and offices provides more insight into our weight woes than any nutrition survey. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2010 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.