| More
Home / Food Police / Headlines


February 11, 2010
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Personal Responsibility Still Ahead?

Personal Responsibility Still Ahead?

By now, you’ve probably heard about the new White House initiative to combat childhood obesity, spearheaded by First Lady Michelle Obama. It’s a noble goal. In anticipation of this announcement, Forbes columnist and American Enterprise Institute senior fellow Karlyn Bowman took a look on Monday at where the public stands regarding obesity, and found that Americans overwhelmingly support personal responsibility:

People see personal responsibility as key. In the CBS poll, 89% said obesity can mostly be controlled with diet and exercise, while 7% said it is out of our hands. This emphasis may be one reason Americans are not enthusiastic about new taxes on unhealthful behaviors.

In a Harris Interactive/Tax Foundation online poll from early 2009 on general tax attitudes, 36% favored a tax on sugary drinks, while 58% were opposed to it. Twenty-three percent favored a tax on foods with salt (71% were opposed), and 39% for junk food in general (56% opposed). On all three items, the opposition was strong: Of the 58% who were opposed to the tax on sugary drinks, for example, 41% were strongly opposed….

Other recent surveys have tied these taxes to health care reform costs, and this impacts the numbers. In an April 2009 Kaiser Family Foundation poll, 52% favored increasing taxes on unhealthy snack foods to "help pay for health care reform and provide coverage for more of the uninsured," but a strong 46% were opposed.

The ending serves as a warning that Americans are more willing to support taxes on “bad” foods if they’re couched as “helping” health care reform. And while the Los Angeles Times reported last week that soft drink taxes are dead federally, soft drink tax crusader Kelly Brownell brags that “We're getting contacted by a new city or state almost every day who are seriously thinking about the idea of a tax.”

The political pendulum is certainly swinging. But with the vast majority of Americans believing in personal responsibility when it comes to weight control, the ploys of self-anointed “food police” who practice social engineering via the tax code face an uphill battle.

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • Video of the Week
    Posted On: Tuesday 7/20/2010
  • Video of the Week
    Posted On: Friday 7/16/2010
  • Big Government Doesn’t Mean Smaller Waistlines
    Posted On: Wednesday 7/14/2010
  • Quote of the Week
    Posted On: Tuesday 7/13/2010
  • SCOTUS Nominee: Food Fascism Is "Dumb"
    Posted On: Wednesday 6/30/2010
  • Reality Check: Food Isn’t Tobacco
    Posted On: Tuesday 6/29/2010
  • Researcher to Salt Police: Back Off
    Posted On: Friday 6/18/2010


  • Activist Cash

    Kelly Brownell
    Background
    Kelly Brownell is a Yale psychologist on a decade-long crusade against what he calls America’s “toxic food environment.” He is best known for having first proposed the infamous “Twinkie tax.” read more here »

    Marion Nestle
    Background
    Marion Nestle is one of the country’s most hysterical anti-food-industry fanatics. She writes: “Sellers of food products do not attract the same kind of attention as purveyors of drugs or tobacco. They should.” read more here »

    OpEds

    Happy Meals lawsuit is food policing at its worst
    The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) has gone too far. The nanny state food cops now want to take the "happy" out of Happy Meals. read more here »

    Table the push to limit salt in foods
    From taxing soft drinks to banning bake sales, public health activists and dietary do-gooders have been beating us up over what we eat and drink. Now they want to rub salt in our wounds. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2010 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.