Resize Font Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Reset Font Size

Home / Big Fat Lies / Headlines

March 25, 2008
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Promoting Government (And Vanity) As Obesity Solution

Promoting Government (And Vanity) As Obesity Solution

People whose livelihoods are rooted in the weight-loss industry have a vested interest in perpetuating obesity hype. Case in point: This morning, USA Today featured an op-ed on that very topic by David Zinczenko, editor of Men's Health magazine and author of numerous diet books. Zinczenko's piece is a prime example of food cop propaganda. Not only does he liken our love handles to assault rifles, but he also paints menu-labeling legislation as some sort of overweight antidote.

Like other nutrition fanatics, Zinczenko levels some big accusations and makes lofty promises, with little evidence to back them up.

For instance, his claim that “a whopping 35% of our weekly caloric intake is consumed in restaurants” is just plain wrong. According to reports from the USDA, thirty five percent of our calories are consumed “away from home,” a figure that includes more than just restaurants. It also covers calories from school lunches, vending machines, residential dining halls, soup kitchens, shelters, meals on wheels, and other public places. When you strip away all of those sources, restaurants actually only count for eight percent of our caloric intake -- a mere 163 calories.

After overestimating dietary statistics, Zinczenko then underestimates our nation’s IQ. He lists the calorie-counts for dishes like French fries and macaroni and cheese, claiming that “the typical American has no way to tell just how unhealthful these choices are.” (What? Of course we do.) If common sense doesn’t give it away, most consumers can figure out the relative “health” of these items same way Zinczenko did -- by checking out the nutritional breakdown already provided by most restaurants.

Menu labeling is an unproven measure that targets only a tiny fraction of our food intake. And many health experts fear that government-mandated calorie counts and other anti-obesity policies may be doing more harm than good. Last month, the London Times addressed this very issue in its educational supplement:

Organizations specializing in eating disorders worry that the focus on young people’s weight—and the way some adults demonize certain foods—is creating a generation obsessed with growing fat and increasingly guilty about eating.

In an Albany Times-Union interview last week, Zinczenko provided his thoughts on the growing number of teenagers harboring unhealthy obsessions with their bodies: “Let’s not treat vanity like a deadly sin. A little more vanity would save a lot more lives.

email us comments



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list
Headlines


Happy Thanksgiving from the Center for Consumer Freedom!
Posted On: Wednesday 11/26/2008

Weight Control Is Second-Grade Math, Not Calculus.
Posted On: Thursday 11/20/2008

Let’s Learn from the Scandinavians!
Posted On: Monday 11/17/2008

The NFL Goes Long To Preserve Phys Ed
Posted On: Tuesday 11/11/2008

Lifestyle Changes Are The Real Obesity Culprit
Posted On: Tuesday 10/21/2008

Unsportsmanlike Conduct From British Food Cops
Posted On: Monday 10/20/2008

Obama and McCain Agree On At Least One Thing
Posted On: Thursday 10/16/2008

Quote of the Week
Posted On: Tuesday 10/14/2008

Quote of the Week
Posted On: Thursday 10/9/2008


ActivistCash.com

Center for Science in the Public Interest
Background | Quotes | Financials
The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is the undisputed leader among America’s “food police.” CSPI’s joyless eating club has issued hundreds of high-profile — and highly questionable — reports condemning soft drinks, fat substitutes, irradiated meat, biotech food crops, French fries, and just about anything that tastes good. read more here »

Op-Eds

Food only part of obesity problem
The cause of obesity isn't what you think. read more here »

Leave calorie counts off the menu; Nutrition is more complex than a few figures can convey.
Although The Times’ editorial was right that "laws that protect consumers from their own unhealthful habits have more than a whiff of the nanny state about them," its support for menu labeling is wrong. read more here »


About Us | Contact Us | Please Help Us | Site Map
Ad Campaigns | Press Center | Daily News Archive | Email Subscription | Op-Eds | Cartoons | Games | Link To Us
Copyright © 1997-2008 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.