Resize Font Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Reset Font Size

printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


HSUS Calling? Hang Up.

HSUS Calling? Hang Up.

Yesterday the Los Angeles Times published a startling exposé of charity telemarketing in California, finding that professional fundraisers in the Golden State keep, on average, 54 cents of every dollar they raise for nonprofits. The Times also singled out one group of charities, including the mega-rich Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), as particularly poor fundraising performers. (This “High Revenue, Low Return” group of charities also included People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.) 

How bad is Californians' return on their telemarketing investment in the Humane Society of the United States? HSUS’s “net return” from 1999 to 2006 (what was left over after professional phone harassers took their cut) totaled just 11.3 percent. If you subtract out two campaigns run for HSUS by the Build-a-Bear Workshop retail chain, which consisted of the sale of stuffed animals—not really “fundraising”—that number shrinks to just 3 percent.

This may surprise you, but not us. Look at this fundraising contract from our files. In 2004, HSUS ran a telemarketing campaign in Connecticut with the Share Group, a fundraising company that promised to return a minimum of zero percent of the proceeds. Yes, zero percent. At the end of the year, Share Group had raised $1,466,145. Not only did absolutely none of that money get where it was supposed to go, but HSUS paid $175,360 for the privilege.

The moral of the story? Whether you’re on the Pacific or the Atlantic coast (or anywhere in between), if someone calls asking for money for the Humane Society of the United States, there's only one smart move: Hang up and make a pledge to your local animal shelter instead.

email us comments



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list
Headlines


It’s Cartoon Friday! (With a Twist)
Posted On: Friday 10/3/2008

Quote Of The Week
Posted On: Monday 9/22/2008

The new PETA: 'Presidential Election Thrills Anglers'?
Posted On: Wednesday 9/17/2008

Memo To The Vegan Fringe: 100-Person Studies Are A Two-Edged Sword
Posted On: Tuesday 9/16/2008

Quote of the Week -- And We’re Citing Ourselves!
Posted On: Friday 9/12/2008

Why Should Vegetarians Define 'Sustainable'?
Posted On: Wednesday 9/10/2008

Quotes of the Week: Hot Dog Pride
Posted On: Friday 9/5/2008

Quote of the Week
Posted On: Thursday 8/28/2008

Oscar Mayer Gets Swift-Boated. Are We Listening?
Posted On: Wednesday 8/27/2008


ActivistCash.com

Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
Background | Quotes | Financials
While PCRM presents itself as a doctor-supported, unbiased source of health guidance, the group’s own literature admits that 95 percent of its members have no medical degrees. read more here »

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
Background | Quotes | Financials
According to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, human beings are just another animal species, no more special or important than a snail darter or dairy cow. read more here »

Op-Eds

Put Helmsley's billions to use in animal shelters
PETA and HSUS have announced their intentions to claim big slices of the $8 billion bounty. But neither one has the track record to handle such a responsibility. read more here »

California Focus: The new animal-rights battleground
The animal-rights movement is far from harmless. And since California seems to be the current animal-rights Ground Zero, it's worth considering what the movement stands for. read more here »


About Us | Contact Us | Please Help Us | Site Map
Ad Campaigns | Press Center | Daily News Archive | Email Subscription | Op-Eds | Cartoons | Games | Link To Us
Copyright © 1997-2008 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.